Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 221 OF 2016

Case between Bindu et al vs Kuttan et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-13
Duration
Less than a year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit involved a partition dispute, and a preliminary decree was passed based on a lawful compromise petition filed by the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court passed a preliminary decree in favor of the plaintiffs based on a lawful compromise petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition preliminary decree
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Compromise petition filed as I.A.336/2017. Since the terms of compromise is lawful a preliminary decree is hereby passed as per the terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bindu (39 years) Kondankadavath House, Naduvattom Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Vysakh Mohan. T. (11 years) Thottungal House, Tirur Amsom and Taluk, Porur Desom, Pookkayil Post

Defendants

Kuttan (50 years) Thottungal House, Tirur Amsom and Taluk, Porur Desom, Pookkayil Post Latha (53 years) Moothedath House, Nannambra Amsom and Desom, Theyyala Post, Tirurangadi Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition preliminary decree
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of the contested property based on compromise petition
Evidence:
Compromise petition filed as I.A.336/2017. Since the terms of compromise is lawful a preliminary decree is hereby passed as per the terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 02/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases