Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
EXECUTION PETITION NO.433 OF 2015

Case between Mundakkora Muhammed Bappu vs Pallikkattil Abdul Khader regarding execution of a civil debt

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-01-12
Duration
3 years 0 months 30 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mundakkora Muhammed Bappu filed a petition for execution of a civil debt against Pallikkattil Abdul Khader, who the petitioner claims has means to pay but intentionally failed to pay the decree debt.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent has sufficient means to pay the decree debt but willfully neglected to pay, leading to an order for arrest and detention in civil prison.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Arrest and detention of the respondent in civil prison
Case Type
Civil Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner provided evidence including property holdings and vehicle ownership of the respondent, which indicated the respondent's capacity to pay off the decree debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. Issue arrest warrant against the respondent. The petitioner shall deposit necessary batta within 7 days.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mundakkora Muhammed Bappu (61 years) S/o Kunheen, Edayoor amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Pallikkattil Abdul Khader (46 years) Athavanad Amsom and Desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Arrest and Detention
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Arrest and detention of the respondent in civil prison
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. Issue arrest warrant against the respondent. The petitioner shall deposit necessary batta within 7 days.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of property holdings of the respondent
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Copy of Registration details of Bus
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of vehicle ownership by the respondent
Reference:
A2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 01/12/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases