Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
EXECUTION PETITION NO. 62 OF 2016

Case between The Secretary in charge vs Sainudheen Poongottil et al regarding full satisfaction under CPC Order 21 Rule 38

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-01-03
Duration
N/A

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Execution Petition No. 62 of 2016 was filed by the petitioner seeking full satisfaction under Order 21 Rule 38 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court recorded full satisfaction resulting in the closure of the execution petition.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court recorded full satisfaction in the execution petition, resulting in its closure.
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Full Satisfaction under Order 21 Rule 38 of CPC
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Full Satisfaction is recorded. Hence EP is closed. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 3ʳᵈ day of January, 2017).

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

The Secretary in charge (Age not specified years) Kurumbathoor, Post Punnathala

Defendants

Sainudheen Poongottil (40 years) Painkannur, Post, Painkannur Moideenkutty Kariparambath (35 years) Melmuri, Post Kandampuzha

Reliefs

Relief Type: Full Satisfaction under Order 21 Rule 38 of CPC
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner's request for full satisfaction recorded
Evidence:
Full Satisfaction is recorded. Hence EP is closed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases