Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 236 OF 2015

Case between Saidalavi vs Muhammed regarding specific performance

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2016-01-14
Duration
Less than 1 year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Saidalavi, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Muhammed seeking specific performance. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to produce balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint filed by Saidalavi seeking specific performance against Muhammed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Plaint rejected due to failure to produce balance court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit - Specific Performance
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff failed to produce Balance Court Fee. Hence the plaint is rejected under order 7, Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Saidalavi (49 years years) Chakkala Kunnath House, Valappuzha Amsom, Cherukode Desom and Post, Ottappalam Taluk, Palakkad District

Defendants

Muhammed (55 years years) Theyyampattil House, Irimbiliyam Amsom, Desom, Irimbiliyam Post

Reliefs

Relief Type: Specific Performance
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaint rejected due to failure to produce balance court fee
Evidence:
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff failed to produce Balance Court Fee. Hence the plaint is rejected under order 7, Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 11/03/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases