Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 121 OF 2014

Case between Kadalayi Hussain et al vs Fakkarudheen Ali Ahammad regarding mandatory injunction and damages

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SRI. BIJU V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2015-10-05
Duration
1 year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs seek a mandatory injunction for the defendant to vacate a property they own, and damages for unauthorized occupation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must vacate the property owned by the plaintiffs and pay damages for use and occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the property and damages for use and occupation
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kadalayi Hussain (59 years) Valavannur amsom and desom, Tirur Taluk Bushra (43 years) Valavannur amsom and desom, Tirur Taluk Ahammad Kabeer (24 years) Valavannur amsom and desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Fakkarudheen Ali Ahammad (45 years) Naluparambil House, Niramaruthur amsom Pathampad desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant to vacate the property
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today.
Relief Type: Damages for Use and Occupation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to realize damages at the rate of Rs.1,000 per month from 10.1.2012
Evidence:
Plaintiffs are allowed to realise damages for use and occupation of the plaint schedule property at the rate of Rs.1,000/- per month from 10.1.2012 from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
License agreement between defendant and previous owner
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to defendant directing him to vacate the property
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of notice received by the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 10/01/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases