Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 98 of 2014

Case between Kadalayi Hussain et al vs Muahammad Haneefa regarding mandatory injunction and damages

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2015-09-11
Duration
1 year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to vacate defendant from the property for violating license terms and claimed damages for unauthorized occupation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs are granted a mandatory injunction against the defendant to vacate the property and awarded damages for unauthorized occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the property and damages for use and occupation
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved ownership and revoked the license agreement due to defendant's breach and unauthorized occupation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plain schedule property within a period of one month from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kadalayi Hussain (59 years) Not mentioned Bushra (43 years) Not mentioned Ahammad Kabeer (24 years) Not mentioned

Defendants

Muahammad Haneefa (46 years) Kapattakathvaliyil House, Pachattiri amsom, Kanoor desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to vacate the property
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plain schedule property within a period of one month from today.
Relief Type: Damages for Use and Occupation
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs allowed to realize damages at the rate of Rs. 2,000 each per month from 10-01-2012
Evidence:
Considering the locational importance of the plaint schedule property and the hike in the occupational charges of the rooms in the recent past, I hold a view that plaintiffs are entitled for realization of damages for use and occupation at the rate of Rs. 2,000/- each per month from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Licensee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's license agreement dated 1-09-1995
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs' lawyer notice to defendant dated 23-12-2011
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal acknowledgment card of notice receipt by defendant dated 23-12-2011
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 09/11/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases