Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
Original Suit No. 351 OF 2014

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayisha et al regarding loan recovery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SRI. BIJU. V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2015-02-05
Duration
1 year

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against legal heirs of a deceased borrower for recovery of an outstanding loan amount of Rs. 1,13,446 along with interest at 12% per annum.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff allowing recovery of the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of Loan Amount with Interest and Costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Money
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case through oral evidence and documents, remaining unchallenged, establishing the defendants' failure to repay the loan amount.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff has proved its case by the oral evidence of PW1 and documents produced in this case. So, the plaintiff is entitled for a decree as prayed for.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kerala Gramin Bank (Age not specified years) Thirunnavaya Branch

Defendants

Ayisha (50 years years) Vattamannil House, Athavanad Para, Athavanad Amsom and Post Ali (47 years years) Vattamannil House, Athavanad Para, Athavanad Amsom and Post Shajudheen (38 years years) Vattamannil House, Athavanad Para, Athavanad Amsom and Post Pathumma (35 years years) Vattamannil House, Athavanad Para, Athavanad Amsom and Post

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery of Loan Amount
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 1,13,446/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum
Evidence:
The plaintiff has proved its case by the oral evidence of PW1 and documents produced in this case. So, the plaintiff is entitled for a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Not available

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Loan application submitted by Kunhimohammed.
Reference:
Prosuant dated 06-12-2011
Document Type: Memorandum of Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural loans executed by Kunhimohammed.
Reference:
A2 dated 06-12-2011
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of statement of accounts showing the details of suit transaction.
Reference:
A3 dated 26-09-2014

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 02/05/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases