Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Restor. 2967/2014

Case between Pathumol vs Suhara et al regarding default dismissal

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G.
Order Date
2015-01-20
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 7 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Pathumol filed a petition against respondents Suhara, Kunhan Bava, and Husain seeking action, but the case was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for default as no notice was issued to respondents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Dismissal
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

No batta paid to issue notice to respondents. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pathumol (52 years) Pattath House, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom and Post

Defendants

Suhara (Age not specified years) Pattath House, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom and Post Kunhan Bava (52 years) Pattath House, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom and Post Husain (Age not specified years) Pattath House, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom and Pos

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not mentioned
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Not mentioned
Evidence:
No batta paid to issue notice to respondents. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Mon, 11/10/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases