Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
Original Suit No 128 of 2014

Case between Kalappurayil Santhi vs Vathsaladevi. S. regarding perpetual injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2014-11-29
Duration
Not mentioned

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Kalappurayil Santhi filed a suit seeking a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant Vathsaladevi. S. from entering the plaint schedule property which the plaintiff obtained through a settlement deed. The defendant claimed right of residence in the property as the mother of the plaintiff's brother's wife, but the court found in favor of the plaintiff due to lack of evidence supporting the defendant's claim.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant failed to establish any right over the plaint schedule property, and the plaintiff, as the rightful owner, was entitled to protection of possession.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff proved ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property through the settlement deed (Exhibit A1).

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kalappurayil Santhi (43 years) Alathiyur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Vathsaladevi. S. (58 years) 3A, Devikripa, Neethi Nagar, Perurkkada, Thiruvananthapuram, Pin: 695 005

Reliefs

Relief Type: Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendant from entering the plaint schedule property
Evidence:
Not mentioned

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property
Reference:
Exhibit A1

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 11/29/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases