| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13481 - 13485 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vadakke Painkal Muhammed Haji vs Chembra Chanthu regarding mandatory injunction and possession

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 85 OF 2014

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-23

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:27/2016

Tirur

2017-02-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nisar vs Thamikutty regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 1462/2016

Malappuram

2017-02-22

0 years, 7 months, 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Zeenath Saries and Fashions Pvt. Ltd. vs Abdul Rasheed et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 63 OF 2017

2017-02-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Unknown vs Unknown regarding Unknown

Civil Suit

O.S.63/17

Parappanangadi

2017-03-07

18 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Failure to pay the required court fees, resulting in petition dismissal for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to prove the petitioner's claims led to the dismissal of the cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner not being present in court during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?