| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13471 - 13475 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Secretary vs Poothulli Shajith Ali et al regarding satisfaction of decree.

Unknown

EP 273/2015

Malappuram

2017-02-25

1 years, 6 months, 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Athiyattil Muhammed Ali et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 360/2015

Tirur,Malappuram

2017-02-25

1 years, 4 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed Musthafa vs Nazar Poozhikunnath regarding cheque dishonor

Criminal Case

S.T. No:61/2015

TIRUR

2017-02-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Chandran vs Sasikala et al regarding cheque dishonour under Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:152/2015

Tirur

2017-02-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nalukandathil Musthafa et al vs Nalukandathil Noushad regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 710 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-02-23

2 years 11 months 8 days

Plaintiffs

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Representation

Cases were dismissed when plaintiffs did not appear in court or provide representation.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not complete necessary procedural steps, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Non-Representation

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?