| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13436 - 13440 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F. 770 vs Sivan Menothil regarding jurisdiction

Execution Petition

EP 80/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-08

0 years, 3 months, 4 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kaliyekkal Saithalikutty Haji et al vs Thadathil Parambil Bharathan et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 314 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-07

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Arimanichola lyyachakkutty vs Ayinikkal Ibrahim et al regarding property dispute and injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 507 OF 2013

2019-05-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Padinhare Purakkal Neeli et al vs Padinharepurakkal Thami et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 247 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-06-06

4 years

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Saidalavi and Moideen regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Loan Closure

EP 336/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-06

1 year, 7 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently did not pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or the means of respondents.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs commonly did not take necessary procedural steps in their cases, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?