| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13421 - 13425 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between GTL Infrastructure Limited et al vs Hamza et al regarding obstruction of mobile tower installation

Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 71 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-13

1 year and 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Payyappanda Salgunan vs Kannachampat Radhakrishnan regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 175 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-06-13

Null

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Suvahiba vs Ummerkutty regarding partition of property

Interlocutory Application

Original Suit No. 105 OF 2016

Tirur Taluk

2019-04-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Vettom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Iqubal et al regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Loan Satisfaction

EP 265/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-13

1 year, 9 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between PuthanPurayil Aboobakker vs Koottath Saharoob et al regarding permanent injunction

Civil Suit - Permanent Injunction

Original Suit No. 374 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-06-12

1 year 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay necessary fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitioners frequently did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take required procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Several petitions were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Non-Representation of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?