| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13076 - 13080 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Muneer Chenganakatil regarding debt settlement

Debt Recovery

EP 45/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-07

0 years, 7 months, 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Shoukathali Valiyakandathil regarding default in remittance

Execution Petition

EP 47/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-07

0 years, 7 months, 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Moolayil Krishnapanikkar et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-03-16

3 years 1 month 25 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Kunhali regarding debt satisfaction

Debt Satisfaction

EP 138/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-06

1 year, 4 months, 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Salim.T.K vs Muhammed Rafi regarding dishonoured cheque

N.I. Act - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No: 56/2016

Tirur

2017-10-06

3 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of batta or necessary court fees.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many plaintiffs failed to produce sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove the respondents' ability to pay.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Default dismissals frequently resulted from plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps for their cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Dismissing cases were often due to the petitioner's absence or non-representation in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?