| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13066 - 13070 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Al Hind Tours and Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs Mundekat Sameer regarding decree petition

Civil Suit - Decree Petition

EP 147/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-10

1 year, 4 months, 4 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri Yoga kshema Sabha vs E. Jayarajan regarding settlement in adalath

Civil Suit

EP 170/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-10

1 year, 2 months, 29 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and finance Co.Pvt. Ltd and A.P Seetharaman regarding Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:79/2017

Tirur

2017-10-10

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Prajeesh Chettiyam thodi concerning loan satisfaction

Civil Execution Petition

EP 48/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-09

0 years, 7 months, 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edarikod Co-Operative Bank et al vs Abdul Rasak regarding enforcement proceedings

Enforcement Proceedings

EP 158/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-09

0 years, 3 months, 2 days

Not available

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence demonstrating the respondents' financial means led to several dismissals of cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were regularly dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?