| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12581 - 12585 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunhimarakkar. C.P et al vs Kumar et al regarding eviction for reconstruction

Rent Control Petition - Eviction

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 78 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-03-15

1 year 11 months 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt.Ltd.vs Ullas.K.C. regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No: 109/2017

Tirur

2018-03-15

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunheema vs Chittappurath Sulaiman et al regarding money suit

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL PETITION (INDIGENT) NO. 9 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-03-14

2 years 11 months 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunheema et al vs Chittappurath et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-14

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Kalam Asad vs Sulaiman. C regarding eviction and realization of arrears of rent.

Original Suit

Original Suit No. 69 OF 2015

Tirur

2019-08-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed because they did not pay the batta required for processing their petitions.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Many petitions were dismissed due to insufficient evidence proving the means or claims of the respondents.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Petitions were often dismissed when the petitioners failed to appear for court hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs frequently failed to issue necessary notices to respondents, leading to petition dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?