Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44 OF 20 15

Case between Kunheema et al vs Chittappurath et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.,B.A LL.B.
Order Date
2018-03-14
Duration
3 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit for injunction was filed by Kunheema and others against Chittappurath and others. However, the suit was rejected by the court due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit for injunction due to non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunheema @ Pathummakutty Umma (83 years) Athavanad amsom, desom, & Post Pin: 676 310, Tirur Taluk Kunheema (46 years) Athavanad amsom, desom, & Post Pin: 676 310, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Chittappurath Sulaiman (50 years) Kurambathur amsom, Edasseri desom, Post Kurumbathur, Pin : 676 310, Tirur Taluk Kambath Marakkar (52 years) Tirur Taluk Kambath Avaran (66 years) Tirur Taluk Kambath Alavikkutty (55 years) Tirur Taluk Kambath Hussain (60 years) Tirur Taluk Mymoona (47 years) Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Injunction suit rejected due to non-payment of court fees
Evidence:
No batta seen deposited against D3 to D6. No balance court fee paid. No Balance court fee has been deposited even after giving sufficient chances. Hence rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of the Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 03/14/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases