| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12556 - 12560 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Unnipookku vs Aleemu et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 15 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-23

2 years 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Melepurath Illathiyil Hameed et al vs Pathumma et al regarding property dispute

Civil Suit - Property Dispute

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1088 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-03-22

4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Panayankandi Mohan Das vs Accomplish Marketing Private Ltd. et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Realization of money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 390 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-03-22

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdurahiman vs Mohammedkutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 279 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-03-21

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnath Avulan kutty Haji vs Parappathiyil Muhammedali et al regarding property possession

Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 111 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-03-21

Approximately 4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the required batta for proceeding with the petition.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Petitioners often did not provide adequate evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Court dismissals frequently occurred due to petitioners failing to appear for scheduled hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?