Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1088 OF 2016

Case between Melepurath Illathiyil Hameed et al vs Pathumma et al regarding property dispute

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-22
Duration
4 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner sought permission to cut and remove shrubs in the schedule property and court allowed it with clear instructions to respondent not to obstruct.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted permission to the petitioner to cut and remove shrubs in the property while instructing the respondent not to obstruct the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to cut and remove shrubs in the property
Case Type
Civil Suit - Property Dispute
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed to cut and remove the shrubs in the petition schedule property and respondent shall not obstruct the petitioner in doing the act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Melepurath Illathiyil Hameed (Age not specified years) Pachattiri amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Pathumma (Age not specified years) Triprangode amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to cut and remove shrubs in the property
Evidence:
The petition is allowed to cut and remove the shrubs in the petition schedule property and respondent shall not obstruct the petitioner in doing the act.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 03/22/2013 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases