| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12491 - 12495 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdurahiman Haji et al vs Rajesh.C.K. et al regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Realisation of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 302 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-13

Approximately 1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Bharathi Auto Finance through its Managing Partner; R.Rajamani vs Damodharan regarding loan realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 313 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-13

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Azeez et al regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 331 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-13

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Puravalappil Appu vs Mohanan regarding property delivery

Civil Suit

EP 175/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-04-13

0 years, 7 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Appu et al vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2997 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-12

8 months and 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for failure to pay necessary court fees known as batta.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Default in Notice Issuance

Petitioners often did not take necessary steps to issue notices to respondents, causing dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of petitioners, showing non-representation in court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default in Notice Issuance

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?