| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12486 - 12490 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdurahiman, S/o Thottukanni Muhammed vs Alavi, S/o Pulikkaparambil Koyakutty regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:04/2016

Tirur

2018-05-04

3 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K.K.Unnikrishnan vs M/s Safety Foods Pvt. Ltd et al regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:03/2018

Tirur

2018-05-04

Approximately 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Baburajan vs Abdul Gafoor et al regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:31/2016

Tirur

2018-04-28

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Mustaffa regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No: 73/2017

Tirur

2018-04-21

5 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Kutty and Moideen Kutty regarding money suit settlement

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 94 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-13

Less than a year (from 2017-04-13 to 2018-04-13)

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Insufficient evidence regarding means of the respondents resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary legal steps, resulting in default dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?