| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12451 - 12455 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kandath Moideen Haji's children et al vs Abdul Vahid et al regarding eviction and super market setup

Civil - Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 40 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-06-11

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanaalakath Mustafa vs Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Ayoob regarding non-appearance

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 373/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-06-07

0 years, 4 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kathiya Umma vs Ahammedukutty regarding declaration of document No. 707/1998 as null and void.

Interlocutory Application

Original Suit No. 18 OF 2016

Tirur Taluk

2019-08-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sakkeena vs Saidalavi regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 343 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-06-07

1 year 192 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 90 OF 2014

2019-09-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in petition dismissals for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide adequate evidence to support their claims or establish financial means.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence or lack of representation at court hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Failure to issue necessary notices to defendants led to multiple dismissals across the cases analyzed.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation in Court

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?