Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 90 OF 2014

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

In the case of Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al, the plaintiff filed a suit for fixation of boundary and injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and counsel for plaintiff reported no instructions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji (64 years) Palachiramad, P.O.Edarikode. PIN - 676 501

Defendants

Pathumma (67 years) Omachapuzha amsom & Post Karinkapara desom Tirur Taluk. PIN - 676 320 Muhammed (47 years) Pathumma (45 years) Nafeesa (43 years) Safiya (41 years)

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases