| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12396 - 12400 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Velayudhan et al vs Ishak.K.M. regarding dishonoured cheque

Cheque Dishonour - Section 138 N.I. Act

S.T. No:55/2017

Tirur

2018-07-05

1 year 45 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Velayudhan vs Ishak regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:L76/2017

Tirur

2018-07-05

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Saidalavi Thangal vs Moideen Koya Haji regarding compensation for malicious prosecution

Civil Suit - Compensation for Malicious Prosecution

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. .1209 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-07-04

3 years 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Rasak.O regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 96/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-07-04

0 years, 2 months, 22 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Khadar et al vs Manoharan.C. et al regarding rent control petition

Rent Control - Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 43 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-07-04

2 years 11 months 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Absence of the plaintiff during hearings led to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to submit adequate evidence, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Lack of procedural actions by the plaintiffs led to case dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?