| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12391 - 12395 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Fathima Beevi et al vs Kunhan Bava et al regarding restoration of the suit

Civil Suit - Restoration

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 497 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-07-03

3 years 6 months 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ambujakshi vs Kandam Parambil Aramughan's children et al regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 146 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-07-12

15 years (from 2002 to 2017)

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sulaiman C vs Abdul Kalam Asad regarding injunction and damages

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1199 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-07-03

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chelakkal Usman vs Chelakkal Ali regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn. 1228/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-07-11

0 years, 1 month, 21 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between V.V. Shareef vs Muhammed Aslam regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:76/2017

Tirur

2018-07-06

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Petitioners often did not present adequate evidence supporting their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Failure to take necessary procedural steps resulted in case dismissals for numerous petitioners.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Cases often dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance at court hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?