| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11806 - 11810 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Anugraha Auto Financiers, et al vs Varghese Joseph, et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 145/2024

PERUMBAVOOR

2025-12-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s NEW SPECIAL DIAGNOSTIC regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS.248/2024

2025-12-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Malathi Kunjamma et al vs Lalitha et al regarding Amendment of Plaint Schedule Property

Civil Case

I. A. No.06/2024 in FDIA 698/2016 in OS No.400/2013

2025-12-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India, Kolenchery Branch, St.Peters College Trust Building, Kolenchery P.O, Aikkaranadu South Village, represented by its Manager, Binoy V.B, et al vs Aji Rajan, A.K.Rajan regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS No. 3 / 2024

2025-03-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.M.Yacob vs Sali Yohannan et al regarding realization of money based on cheques

Civil Suit

I.A No. 3/2024 in OS No. 6 / 2023

Kolenchery

2025-03-05

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay required processing fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners often did not appear in court, resulting in automatic case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Petitioners consistently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Petitioners neglected to follow necessary procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?