| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11801 - 11805 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank Of Baroda vs M/s New Mega Care regarding Decree Holder absent

Civil Case

E.P. No. 44/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-12-03

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Pathrose vs Baby regarding Execution Proceedings

Execution Proceedings

E.P. 276/2023

2025-12-03

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Pathrose vs Baby regarding review of order

Review Petition

E.A. 133/2025

Perumbavoor

2025-12-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s Arrikar Foods Pvt. Ltd., et al vs M/s Swapna Traders, regarding recovery of dues for purchase of rice products

Civil

OS.199/2025

Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District, Kerala

2025-12-01

7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11

Civil Suit

OS.61/2024

2025-12-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay required processing fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners often did not appear in court, resulting in automatic case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Petitioners consistently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Petitioners neglected to follow necessary procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?