| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11556 - 11560 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K M Sudheer Kumar et al vs Gurudeva Satsangham et al regarding declaration of officer bearers

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1288/2018

Ernakulam

2025-02-13

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between M.P. Somashekaran Pillai vs Sajikumar.S. regarding landlord-tenant dispute

Petition filed under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

R.C.P. No.55/2023

ERNAKULAM

2025-02-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. Jaisy Roy, Roy Thomas vs Mr. Sunny. S regarding Lease and Rent Control Act petition

Lease and Rent Control Act petition

R.C.P. No.83/2024

Ernakulam

2025-02-12

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between K.I. Subair Mather et al vs Kadeeja Majeed et al regarding eviction

Petition under Section 11(4)(v) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

R.C.P. No.161/2021

ERNAKULAM

2025-02-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V. N Ranganathan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction and consequential relief

Injunction

O.S No. 337/2020

Ernakulam District

2025-02-21

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Petitioners did not present sufficient evidence demonstrating their case, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Many petitions were dismissed due to the petitioners' absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to issue required notices to respondents, leading to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?