| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11536 - 11540 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s LULU International Shopping Mall (P) Ltd. vs Nucleus Premium Properties (P) Ltd regarding dismissal for default

Civil Suit

O.S No. 334/2018

Ernakulam

2025-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Fathima Jaleel Ponthanal et al regarding Money Realization

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 129/2024

Ernakulam

2025-02-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ansals Riverdale Owners Association et al vs Dr. Sunil Kumar regarding Suit for realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 130/2023

2025-02-17

2 years 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mujib Rahiman Kaja Hussain vs Naval Ditto V regarding money for realisation of arrears of rent

Civil Suit

O.S No. 187/2021

Ernakulam

2025-02-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Modish Electricals & Appliances regarding Default judgment

Civil Suit

O.S. No.247/2024

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-02-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or demonstrate means of payment.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Many plaintiffs did not pay necessary fees or batta required for processing their petitions.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Several cases were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners during court proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take required procedural steps such as issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?