| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10916 - 10920 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Leelavathy Amma et al vs Santhosh et al regarding fixation of northern boundary and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1061/2022

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sajitha Mahin vs Sheriff regarding eviction petition under Section 5 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 129/2018

Ernakulam

2025-11-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C. Hari Prakash et al vs Prasanna Sajeev regarding eviction under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 171/2024

Ernakulam

2025-11-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Sulaiman C B et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 741/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Maju P Abraham vs R.R.Antony, K.J.Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 46/2009

Ernakulam District

2025-11-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence for their claims.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Take Action

Cases often dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps or file required documents.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Numerous petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear in court.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Action

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?