| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10906 - 10910 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abi Raghavan vs Smitha Paul et al regarding Temporary Injunction

Injunction

O.S No. 931/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Reignonline Internet Private Limited et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit

O.S No. 190/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Sunpaul Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Bauer Engineers & Elevators regarding plaint rejection

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 222/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Salasho Incorporated et al regarding suit for relief

Civil Suit

O.S No. 438/2024

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nimmy Titto vs Paul Paily et al regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

O.S No. 474/2024

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Dismissing cases where the petitioner was absent from court proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?