RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 73/2023

Case between V.S. Leelamani vs P.K. James regarding Rent Control Petition

Court

RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I

Judge

Smt. Shabeena M.

Order Date

2025-04-10

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

V.S. Leelamani filed a rent control petition against P.K. James. The case centered around the maintainability of the rent control petition based on a license agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The Rent Control Petition was deemed not maintainable and was dismissed by the court.

Key Reasoning:
The court found that the Rent Control Petition was not maintainable due to the nature of the agreement.

Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the Rent Control Petition was not maintainable due to the nature of the agreement.

Supporting Evidence

The document produced by the respondent along with her counter shows that the entrustment was by way of a license agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find that the Rent Control Petition is not maintainable. Rent Control Petition dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: V.S. Leelamani
Party Age: 67
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.K. James
Party Age: 63
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Muhammed Iqubal K.M.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Noorjahan C.V.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K. Sivadasan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sajna Muhammed Ali
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Rent Control Petition dismissed

Evidence:

Hence I find that the Rent Control Petition is not maintainable.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification