EP No. 234/2025

Case between Vilasini et al vs Jayaprakasan Mappila Parambil regarding execution petition.

Court

Court of the Munsiff-II, Kozhikode

Judge

Smt. Savitha. T.P

Order Date

2025-08-16

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vilasini and others filed an execution petition against Jayaprakasan Mappila Parambil. The petition was about the execution of a previously issued decree which the decree holder claimed was satisfied.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder reported that the delivery was effected and the decree was satisfied.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder reported that the delivery was effected and the decree was satisfied.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder reported that the decree was satisfied.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder reported that the decree was satisfied.

Supporting Evidence

Decree Holder submitted that decree satisfied.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vilasini
Party Age: 82
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Devasena
Party Age: 79
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Prema
Party Age: 75
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shobhana
Party Age: 74
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Usha
Party Age: 72
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jayaprakasan Mappila Parambil
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. P.C. Satheesh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

EP closed as decree satisfied.

Evidence:

Decree Holder submitted that decree satisfied. Hence EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification