Case Summary
Vijayakumar D. is the plaintiff and Jalal Nazar is the defendant. The suit was dismissed for default as neither party was present in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayakumar D.
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jalal Nazar
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sureshkumar Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Krishna S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Sabeer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayakumar D. vs Jalal Nazar regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayakumar D. vs Jalal Nazar regarding dismissal for default