Case Summary
This case involves Vibin KP as the plaintiff and multiple entities of Kerala Gramin Bank as defendants. The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and failure to provide evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vibin KP
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kerala Gramin Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kerala Gramin Bank
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.MC Ratnakaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.KK Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.PP George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanently prohibitory injunction requested by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaint presented by plaintiff, under Section 26 r/w Order 7, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure for Permanent prohibitory injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vibin KP vs Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Vibin KP vs Manager, Kerala Gramin Bank regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction.