Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 52 OF 2014

Case between Vattiyam Veettil Ismail vs State of Kerala et al regarding eviction

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B., RENT CONTROLLER
Order Date
2016-10-31
Duration
2 years 4 months 9 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks eviction of respondents from a shop room for his intended paint and hardware business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petitioner granted eviction under section 11(3) for his genuine need to start a paint and hardware business.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction
Case Type
Eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner proved genuine need for the shop room for starting his business, while respondents failed to show bonafide reasons to refuse eviction.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, I hold a view that petitioner is entitled for an order of eviction u/s 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act and he is not entitled to get an order of eviction u/s 11(2) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Points are found accordingly.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vattiyam Veettil Ismail (44 years) Vattiyam Veettil House, Vettom amsom & Post, Vemanna Desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

State of Kerala (Age not specified years) Collectorate, Malappuram Salam (Age not specified years) Maveli Store, Alissery, Vettom Post, Tirur Taluk Depot Manager, Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation (Age not specified years) Tirur Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (Age not specified years) Maveli Bhavan, Gandhi Nagar, Kochi

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondents from the shop room for the petitioner's genuine business need.
Evidence:
Therefore, I hold a view that petitioner is entitled for an order of eviction u/s 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act and he is not entitled to get an order of eviction u/s 11(2) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Points are found accordingly.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demand for eviction and vacant possession of the building on 20-06-2014.
Reference:
A1(a)
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply notice from Depot Manager stating rent conditions.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report regarding the petition schedule property condition.
Reference:
A4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 06/20/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

State Government

Similar Cases