Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P.No.44/2023

Case between Ushakumari vs Aravind Suresh et al regarding eviction from a rental property

Court
Rent Control Court
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months
Case Code No.
44
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ushakumari, the petitioner, seeks eviction of her tenants, Aravind Suresh, Sathi, and Sunitha S.S, citing non-payment of rent and property damage. The case involves disputes over tenancy agreements and the condition of the rental property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially allowed the petition, granting the petitioner arrears of rent from the second and third counter petitioners and entitled her to seek eviction of the same for her bonafide requirement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the 2nd and 3rd counter petitioners from the rental property.
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court partially allowed the petition, granting the petitioner arrears of rent from the second and third counter petitioners and entitled her to seek eviction of the same for her bonafide requirement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated that the counter petitioners failed to pay rent and established a bonafide requirement for her own need.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The testimony of PW1 was unrebutted, and 1st counter petitioner has no case that petitioner has another building in the same locality sufficient for her bonafide requirement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is partly allowed with costs as per the following terms: a) The 2nd and 3rd counter petitioners are hereby directed to vacate the premises of Petition Schedule Building u/s 11(2) (b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act and surrender and put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ushakumari
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aravind Suresh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha. S.S
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Agreement dated 16.09.2021, Rental Agreement dated 01.10.2022, Legal Notice dated 11.08.2023.
Defendants Documents
Attested Copy of O.P. No.2619/2022 from Hon’ble Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram, Attested Copy of objection in O.P(H.M.A)No.2619/2022 from Hon’ble Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Hari.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Suja.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Beena.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Petitioner sought eviction of the 2nd and 3rd counter petitioners from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The 2nd and 3rd counter petitioners are hereby directed to vacate the premises of Petition Schedule Building u/s 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner claimed arrears of rent from the 2nd and 3rd counter petitioners.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled for arrears of rent at the tune of Rs.3,500/- from the 2nd and 3rd counter petitioners for period mentioned in Ext.A3 legal notice dated 11.08.2023.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the initial rental agreement between the petitioner and the 1st counter petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rental Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the renewed rental agreement executed by the petitioner and the 2nd counter petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document through which the petitioner demanded arrears of rent and possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards & Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Collectively serves as evidence related to the service of legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4 Series
Document Type: Attested Copy of O.P. No.2619/2022
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document presented by the 1st counter petitioner relating to a family court petition.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Attested Copy of Objection in O.P(H.M.A) No.2619/2022
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further evidence submitted by the 1st counter petitioner in the family court case.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 09/16/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sarala A. vs Nakshathra Viju regarding eviction due to non-payment of rent.
Rent Control Court
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kuruvila Joseph vs Akilraj regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Al Shine Fine Restaurants LLP et al vs Vishnu Satheesh regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K.Sekharan vs Remani Stanley regarding eviction from rented premises
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between H.Muhammed Sameer et al vs Raji.N. Sujith regarding eviction of tenant
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won