Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
Original Suit No. 326 OF 2015

Case between Unnikrishnan vs Shajikumar regarding money realization

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-07-27
Duration
2 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Unnikrishnan filed a suit against Shajikumar to realize Rs.1,20,000 with interest, after a cheque issued by Shajikumar was returned due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that Shajikumar must pay Rs. 1,20,000 with interest to Unnikrishnan and also bear the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree to pay Rs. 1,20,000 with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Realisation
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence of the cheque issuance and subsequent non-payment by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,20,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till today and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Unnikrishnan (52 years) Kumbalaparambil Veedu, Athavanad amsom, desom, Post Athavanad, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 301

Defendants

Shajikumar (49 years) Thachilath Veedu, Athavanad amsom, desom and Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Realization
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree to pay Rs. 1,20,000 with interest
Evidence:
In the result the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,20,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till today and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type: Costs Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff
Evidence:
The plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Photo copy of Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of cheque issuance by defendant
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo received from SBT, Valanchery Branch
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt of the lawyer notice sent to the defendant
Reference:
A5

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 07/14/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases