Case Summary
Multiple minors represented by their parents and next friends filed a suit for declaration, but the case was dismissed as the counsel for the plaintiffs had no instructions and the plaintiffs were absent during the final hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration
Final Judgment
No
The suit for declaration was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of instructions to counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for declaration. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suyesha.C.T.
- Party Age
- 16
- Relation
- Rep. By mother and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreeshma.K.
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Rep. By Father and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pooja.S.
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Rep. By mother and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sukanya.K.P.
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Rep. By Father and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreethu.K.
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Rep. By mother and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rahul.K.P.
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Rep. By mother and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nandana Radhakrishnan
- Party Age
- 16
- Relation
- Rep. By Father and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Harisree.P.N.
- Party Age
- 15
- Relation
- Rep. By mother and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suneethi.T.P.
- Party Age
- 15
- Relation
- Rep. By mother and next friend
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jeenisha.K.
- Party Age
- 16
- Relation
- Rep. By mother and next friend
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- General Convenor, Programme Committee, Malappuram District Kalolsavom 2017-18, Gov. Model H.S.S., Calicut University Campus
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appeal Committee Chairman, Programme Committee, Kuttippuram Sub District Kalolsavom 2017-18, Gov. Vocational Higher Secondary School
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for declaration
Evidence:
The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suyesha et al vs General Convenor et al regarding suit for declaration
Case Code Year
Case between Suyesha et al vs General Convenor et al regarding suit for declaration