Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact
OS.342/2019

Case between Sunny Antony vs Jafarkhan regarding suit rejection.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunny Antony filed a suit against Jafarkhan. The case was rejected by the court due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee, resulting in the rejection of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the necessary court fee led to the rejection of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit rejected. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 24 th day of October, 2025.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sunny Antony (64 years) Kakkat House, Erumathala P O, Aluva Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Jafarkhan (58 years) Karuvally, Mukalarkudy House, Vengola P O, Arackapady Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. Balance court fee not remitted. Hence suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases