Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 124/2021

Case between Suchitha Gopinath vs Baburaj A.K. regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Suchitha Gopinath is the plaintiff seeking a mandatory injunction against Baburaj A.K. for not vacating the shop room and for the payment of arrears of license fee. The case involved issues related to a license agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendant to vacate the shop room and pay the arrears of license fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the premises and payment of arrears of license fee.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendant to vacate the shop room and pay the arrears of license fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged and established the case for a mandatory injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged and established the case for a mandatory injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and the documents produced by him remained unchallenged. As such I find that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to vacate the plaint schedule premises.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule shop room within one month from today, failing which the plaintiff can get the decree executed through the process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suchitha Gopinath
Party Age
77
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baburaj A.K.
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney executed by Suchitha Gopinath in favour of Ajith Gopinath Naik, Licence agreement entered into between Suchitha Gopinath and Baburaj A.K., Copy of lawyer notice sent by Adv. K.K. Ramakrishnan to Baburaj A.K.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Shaju George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. K.K. Ramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule shop room within one month.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule shop room within one month from today, failing which the plaintiff can get the decree executed through the process of law.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is liable to pay arrears of license fee for 31 months.
Evidence:
The defendant is liable to pay arrears of license fee for 31 months @ Rs.9,000/- per month from June 2019 to March 2021 which comes to Rs.1,98,000/- (Rupees one lakh ninety eight thousand only) with 9% interest per annuam.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is liable to pay arrears of license fee from April 2021 till realisation.
Evidence:
The defendant is liable to pay arrears of license fee from April 2021 till realisation @ Rs.9,000/- per month with 9% interest per annuam.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to establish the authority of the plaintiff's witness.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to show the terms of the license under which the defendant occupied the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to demonstrate the plaintiff's demand for rent arrears and vacation of premises.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced as proof of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Suchitha Gopinath vs Baburaj A.K. regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Suchitha Gopinath vs Baburaj A.K. regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 06/21/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.Mushthak Ali vs K.V.Alikoya et al regarding injunction against forceful dispossession
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Balan Nair vs Shoukathali K.P. regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahabeese P.V. vs Shijin Kumar K.C. regarding mandatory injunction and for realization of arrears of license fee and damages
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won