Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP. 8/2022

Case between State bank of India vs Sreekumar Assay.S regarding Execution Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Code No.
8
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves an execution petition filed by the State Bank of India against Sreekumar Assay.S regarding the non-production of necessary documents for execution. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the decree holder and failure to produce required certificates.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder and the failure to produce the required documents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder and the failure to produce the required documents.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the decree holder failed to produce essential documents despite being provided multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the decree holder failed to produce essential documents despite being provided multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the materials this court is of the view that no further time need be granted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekumar Assay.S
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Encumbrance Certificate, Valuation Certificate, Draft Sale Proclamation
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Devadas.(Legal Aid Counsel)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Execution Petition was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Encumberance Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Requested by the learned counsel of the Decree Holder but not produced.
Reference:
Document Type: Valuation certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Requested by the learned counsel of the Decree Holder but not produced.
Reference:
Document Type: Draft Sale Proclamation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Requested by the learned counsel of the Decree Holder but not produced.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Noushad A.S regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank, Varkala Branch vs Sunil regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank, Kadakkavoor Branch vs Mani. C., @ Mani Achari et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sameer. S et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank, Varkala Branch vs Jeevanlal et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won