Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.388/2023

Case between State Bank of India vs Ms.Mubeena C et al regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
approximately-8 years 4 months
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

State Bank of India has filed a suit against Ms. Mubeena C and Mrs. Jameela K for repayment of an education loan. The defendants defaulted on the loan repayment despite several demands from the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the amount due along with interest and costs. The defendants have been found liable for the repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,43,715/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the amount due along with interest and costs. The defendants have been found liable for the repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff established entitlement to the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff established entitlement to the decree.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Ext. A1 to A8 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,43,715/- (Rupees Two Lakh Forty Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifteen only) from the defendants with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ms.Mubeena C
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs.Jameela K
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of the acquisition of State Bank of Travancore, loan application, sanction letter, agreement for loan for education, copy of lawyer notice, returned postal cover, acknowledgment card, true extract of bank account statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vinod Singh Cheriyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.TM Khalid
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Saranya O
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri Shynu H
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Seema Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the loan amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,43,715/- (Rupees Two Lakh Forty Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifteen only) from the defendants with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: True copy of the acquisition of State Bank of Travancore, Order 2017
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the legal background of the State Bank of Travancore's acquisition.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This application shows the request made by the defendants for the education loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the sanctioning of the loan to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement for loan for education
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms under which the loan was granted.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants demanding repayment of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned postal cover with acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the attempt to deliver the notice to one defendant, which failed.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms that the notice sent to the second defendant was received.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: True extract of Bank account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides a detailed account of the loan transactions related to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Ms.Mubeena C et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Ms.Mubeena C et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 02/03/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Shyama VP regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Vellimadukunnu Branch vs Arjun Sai et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Mr.Manoj Kumar regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sumina C.K. et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Dasan regarding realisation of money
The Additional Munsiff-I, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won