Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 413/2024

Case between The State Bank of India vs Balakrishnan regarding settlement of a civil suit.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-02-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India is the plaintiff represented by its Chief Manager, while Balakrishnan is the defendant. The case was about a civil suit that resulted in a compromise between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as per the terms of the compromise. The court fee paid shall be refunded to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Court fee paid shall be refunded to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as per the terms of the compromise. The court fee paid shall be refunded to the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Terms of compromise were found to be lawful.
Why Defendant Won:
Terms of compromise were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms are found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as per the terms of compromise. The joint compromise shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balakrishnan
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinod Singh Cheriyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sruthi C.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.M. Khalid
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saranya O.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Prameela M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Terms of the joint compromise recorded
Evidence:
Hence compromise recorded.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Court fee paid shall be refunded to the plaintiff
Evidence:
The court fee paid shall be refund to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim attachment made is lifted
Evidence:
Interim attachment made as per order in IA 2/2024 dated 23.10.2024 is lifted.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed as per the terms of compromise
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as per the terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The State Bank of India vs Balakrishnan regarding settlement of a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between The State Bank of India vs Balakrishnan regarding settlement of a civil suit.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Abhinand K.R. et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Thamarassery Branch vs Musammil M.M., Muhammed M.M. regarding a compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won