Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP.No.54/2022

Case between St. Thomas Evangelical Fellowship of India et al vs Jose Panachikkal Peter regarding payment of rent arrears

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 month
Case Code No.
54
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, landlords, filed an application against the respondent, a tenant, for payment or deposit of arrears of rent. The petitioners claim the respondent has defaulted on rent payments since July 2020, while the respondent contends he has been paying rent promptly and has made improvements to the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to pay the arrears of rent from July 2020 onwards. The total arrears amount to Rs.7,44,000/- along with 6% interest per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent to pay arrears of rent of Rs.12,000/- per month from July 2020 onwards, amounting to Rs.7,44,000/- plus interest.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to pay the arrears of rent from July 2020 onwards. The total arrears amount to Rs.7,44,000/- along with 6% interest per annum.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to substantiate payments and had no evidence supporting his claims regarding the condition of the building.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to substantiate payments and had no evidence supporting his claims regarding the condition of the building.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent has not produced any documents to substantiate the payments made by him to the petitioner or any account statement for the constructions alleged to be made by him with the consent of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed with costs and directing the respondent to pay the arrears of rent of Rs.12,000/- (Rupees Twelve thousand only) per month from July 2020 onwards till the date of this order, which amounts to Rs.7,44,000/- (Rupees Seven lakhs and Forty Four thousand only) along with 6% interest per annum within one month from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
St. Thomas Evangelical Fellowship of India
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reverend Joy Mathew
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P P Kurien
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose Panachikkal Peter
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Rental Agreement dated 02.07.2019, Copy of acknowledgment cards, Copy of postal receipts, Advocate notice dated 09.05.2022, Reply notice dated 15.06.2022, Decision dated 29.04.2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.P.A. Sindhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Jalaja Saisree
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Ramya Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. N. Gopalakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners were granted a recovery of arrears of rent from the tenant.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed with costs and directing the respondent to pay the arrears of rent of Rs.12,000/- (Rupees Twelve thousand only) per month from July 2020 onwards.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original rental agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original rental agreement dated 02.07.2019 establishes the landlord-tenant relationship and rent amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards and Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents support the claim related to the landlord's communications with the tenant.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The advocate notice dated 09.05.2022 was issued to demand payment of arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply notice dated 15.06.2022 addresses the tenant's objections to the arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Decision of Executive Committee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This decision authorizes the second petitioner to conduct the petition.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
RCP.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 07/02/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Church

Similar Cases

Case between James Fletcher vs Ramakrishnan Ravi regarding eviction
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Trivandrum Ex-Servicemen Automobile Engineering & Transport Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd. vs M/s. Redcherry Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding eviction of tenant
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr.S.Krishna Kumar vs Manoj regarding eviction proceedings
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Renuka Vijayan vs T.N Chinnappan regarding eviction for non-payment of rent.
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Debu Raju vs Saritha Suresh regarding arrears of rent
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won