Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No 442/2019

Case between Sri. Saju.D.S. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding mediation agreement

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-22
Duration
approximately-4 years 21 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/22/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sri. Saju.D.S., filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding a mediation agreement. The court found the terms of the mediation agreement to be lawful and decreed the suit in accordance with the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit based on the lawful terms of the mediation agreement. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the entire court fees paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of entire court fees including Legal Benefit Fund paid.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit based on the lawful terms of the mediation agreement. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the entire court fees paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the terms of mediation agreement are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. Saju.D.S.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Greater Cochin Development Authority
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roshin Ipe Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Priya Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aniyan.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled for refund of entire court fees including Legal Benefit Fund paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff entitled for refund of entire court fees including Legal Benefit Fund paid.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sri. Saju.D.S. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding mediation agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Sri. Saju.D.S. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding mediation agreement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/22/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won