Case Summary
The plaintiff, Soumya C.S, and the defendant, S. Prasanna Babu, were involved in a suit that was ultimately dismissed. The plaintiff indicated no intention to proceed with the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Unknown
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not intend to prosecute the matter.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not intending to prosecute the matter.
The plaintiff was not intending to prosecute the matter.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not intending to prosecute the matter.
The plaintiff was not intending to prosecute the matter.
Supporting Evidence
the plaintiff is not intending to prosecute the matter.
Judgment Evidence:
the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Soumya C.S
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S. Prasanna Babu
- Party Age
- 65
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anil Kumar. A.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sharrown Azeez
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the plaintiff Adv. Nikhil Nandan submitted that the plaintiff is not intending to prosecute the matter. Hence, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Unknown
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022