Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No.134/2022

Case between Shibili Sanjith vs Muhammed Nazeem M et al regarding eviction due to non-payment of rent

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Anjali. P
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
approximately-2 years 9 months
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shibili Sanjith, the petitioner, filed for eviction of Muhammed Nazeem M and others for non-payment of rent on a property originally owned by her late husband. The petitioner claims a genuine need for the property to start a tailoring business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the rent control petition, directing the respondents to vacate the property and pay the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction under section 11(2)(b) and payment of costs
Case Type
Rent Control Case
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the rent control petition, directing the respondents to vacate the property and pay the costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner established the landlord-tenant relationship and genuine need for the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioner established the landlord-tenant relationship and genuine need for the property.
Supporting Evidence
PW1 has categorically stated that despite receipt of statutory notice, the respondents have not paid the arrears of rent. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to an order under section 11 (2) (b) of the Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, rent control petition is allowed... Respondents are directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within one month from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shibili Sanjith
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Nazeem M
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseema
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Maskan
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer notice dated 24.09.2022, Postal Receipts, Acknowledgment Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.B.Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Akshay Kamath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Muhammed Sadique U.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Muhammed Shameem Paksan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition for eviction under Section 11(2)(b) and Section 11(3) of the Act allowed.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under Section 11 (2) (b) and Section 11 (3) of the of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
Respondents are directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule building within one month from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are directed to pay costs of the proceedings to the petitioner.
Evidence:
Respondents are also directed to pay costs of the proceedings to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer notice calling upon the respondents to pay the arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt pertaining to the notice issued to respondent No 1.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card pertaining to the notice issued to respondent No 1.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Returned Unclaimed Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to Respondent No 2 which was returned unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned Unclaimed Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to Respondent No 3 which was returned unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Case
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shibili Sanjith vs Muhammed Nazeem M et al regarding eviction due to non-payment of rent
Case Code Year
Case between Shibili Sanjith vs Muhammed Nazeem M et al regarding eviction due to non-payment of rent

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 09/12/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P. P. Alikoya vs Muthoot Fincorp Ltd regarding restoration of a rent control petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Venugopal. S. vs Abdul Suneer. P regarding eviction
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Rent Control Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Sabira et al vs Hashim Thangal regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shabeel vs MT Gafoor regarding delivery of possession
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Case Plaintiff Won
Case between C.Vijayakumar vs K.Shibu regarding withdrawal of rent control petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Case Plaintiff Won