Case Summary
Shek Muhammed is the petitioner, and Abdul Vahab is the counter petitioner. The petition has been dismissed due to the absence of the respondent and non-compliance with court directives.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed by the court due to the absence of the respondent and other procedural defects.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on this the 28th day of June 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shek Muhammed
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Vahab
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Poonthura Tharif. B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the respondent and failure to cure defects.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024