Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 8 OF 2016

Case between Shamsudheen vs Menoth Lakshmanan et al regarding Rent Control

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN, B.Com., LL.B., LL.M., PRESIDING OFFICER (MUNSIFF)
Order Date
2019-09-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Involves a dispute between Shamsudheen and Menoth Lakshmanan's family over a leased building. Shamsudheen seeks eviction due to non-payment of rent and lack of business activity by the respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petitioner granted eviction of the building from respondents due to non-payment of rent and lack of business activity. Respondents required to vacate within three months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner proved lack of rent payment and business activity by respondents.

Judgment Evidence:

Verbatim judgment text not available.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Shamsudheen (58 years) Chundam Veettil Kappattakath House, Vettom amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Menoth Lakshmanan's wife Sarada (69 years) Tirur amsom Kott desom Pazhamkulangara, near Kallingal Jaram, Tirur Taluk Menoth Lakshmanan's son Pramod (50 years) Tirur amsom Kott desom Pazhamkulangara, near Kallingal Jaram, Tirur Taluk Praveen (48 years) Tirur amsom Kott desom Pazhamkulangara, near Kallingal Jaram, Tirur Taluk Prajeesh (43 years) Tirur amsom Kott desom Pazhamkulangara, near Kallingal Jaram, Tirur Taluk Praseeda (39 years) Tirur amsom Kott desom Pazhamkulangara, near Kallingal Jaram, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner granted possession of building
Evidence:
Petitioner entitled to get an order of eviction under relevant sections of the Act
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner to realize costs from respondents
Evidence:
Petitioner entitled to realize costs of the petition from respondents

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff demanded surrender of building
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt of notices sent to respondents
Reference:
Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to property ownership
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Photo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to evidence of business activities
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C3
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases